Legal Responsibility of Advocates in Abuse of Power of Attorney from Clients
Main Article Content
Abstract
The legal responsibility of advocates in the context of abuse of power granted by clients is an issue that is increasingly relevant amid the increasing number of deviant legal practices. In particular, this study examines how the actions of advocates who exceed the limits of authority or abuse their power impact the rights of clients and the integrity of the legal profession. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal basis of advocate liability and identify regulatory weaknesses that cause weak protection for clients. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory and conceptual approach, as well as secondary data in the form of legal literature and court decisions. The results of the study show that there is a regulatory vacuum regarding external supervision, weak code of ethics enforcement, and lack of legal protection for clients. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out regulatory reforms that include the establishment of independent supervisory institutions, revisions of the Advocate Law, and strengthening advocate professional education to be more oriented towards ethics and accountability. This study recommends the need for a legal system that is able to balance the protection of the profession and the rights of the legal services user community.
Downloads
Article Details
Section

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ICLR License Terms
All articles published in the Indonesian Civil Law Review (ICLR) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. Under this license:
-
You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
-
You are free to adapt, remix, and build upon the material for any non-commercial purpose.
-
You must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and source, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
-
If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
-
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
How to Cite
References
Adiyanta, FCS. “Hukum Dan Studi Penelitian Empiris: Penggunaan Metode Survey Sebagai Instrumen Penelitian Hukum Empiris.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 4 (2019): 698.
Ali, Zainuddin. “Metode Penelitian Hukum,” hlm 99. Jawa Timur: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Angga Priancha, Ardia Khairunnisa, Tasya Caroline, Gilang Sephia. “Rethinking ‘Electronic Agent’ Terminology In The Law On Electronic Information And Transaction From The Perspective Of Indonesian Lastgeving Law.” Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gajah Mada 43, no. 2 (2022): 378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v34i2.3864.
Arlina, Liza, Luthfi Alfarizi Nasution, Muhammad Rizky Khoir, and Nurul Miftahul Jannah. “Tinjauan Hukum Pelanggaran Kode Etik Advokat: Studi Kasus Roy Rening.” Judge : Jurnal Hukum 06, no. 01 (2025): 251–62. https://journal.cattleyadf.org/index.php/Judge/index.
Boli, Eril, and Muh Nur Hidayat M. “Agrarian Law Reform in Indonesia : Between Legal Certainty and Social Justice.” Indonesian Civil Law Review (ICLR) 1, no. 1 (2025): 53–68. https://ejurnal.mgpublishing.co.id/index.php/iclr/article/view/5/6.
Bunga, Marten. “Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Gugatan Sederhana.” Gorontalo Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 41–51.
Didik Sumariyanto, Efa Laela Fakhriah. “Kajian Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Pelanggaran Etik Advokat Dihubungkan Dengan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Kuhp) Dan Pasal 26 Angka 6 Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat.” Jurnal Iustitia Omnibus I, no. 2 (2020): 30–49.
Eizeluna Farnesty, Fenny Rahma Sari, Raihan Dzaky, Rani Bela Septia, Siti Balqis Alayya, Syifa Maura Adinda, and Vina Khalisa. “Etika Profesi Hukum: Mengungkap Pelanggaran Kode Etik Dalam Kasus Suap Pengacara.” Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora 1, no. 6 (2024): 98–116. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v1i6.555.
Endira, Bramedika Kris, Muhammad Junaidi, Bramedika Kris Endira, Muhammad Junaidi, Diah Sulistyani, Ratna Sediati, and Amri Panahatan Sihotang. “Kedudukan Dan Peran Organisasi Profesi Advokat Terhadap Advokat Yang Berhadapan Dengan Hukum The Position and Role of Advocate Professional Organizations Toward Advocates Which Deals with Law Penelitian Ini Mencoba Untuk Mengkaji Tentang Bagaimana Keduduk.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 389–400.
Fadhilah, Nurul. “Perspektif Hukum Pidana Serta Penegakannya Terhadaptindak Pidana Perjudian Sabung Ayam Di Kabupaten Pohuwato.” Indonesian Civil Law Review (ICLR) 1, no. 1 (2025): 18–36.
Hastia, andi azizah. “Dari Klik Ke Kontrak : Pertimbangan Hukum Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Online.” Indonesian Civil Law Review (ICLR) 1, no. 1 (2025): 37–52.
Hijrah Lahaling, Arhjayati Rahim, Sumiyati Beddu, Dzikra Ridha Dwi Aribah, Saharuddin Saharuddin. “Legal Pluralism in the Tayade System: Reconciling Land and Plant Ownership Laws in Gorontalo.” Jurnal Ilmiah Al- Syir ’ Ah 23, no. 1 (2025): 1–17. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30984/jis.v23i1.3325.
Ilham. “Law Enforcement Against Gorontalo City Police Area Gambling Crime In.” Indonesian Civil Law Review (ICLR) 1, no. 1 (2025): 1–17. https://ejurnal.mgpublishing.co.id/index.php/iclr/article/view/1/4.
Ishak, A. M., Busthami, D., & Poernomo, S. L. “Kesediaan Dan Ketersediaan Hukum Gugatan Perwakilan Dalam Perspektif Activisme Yudisial Dan Pembatalan Yudisial.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) 2, no. 2 (2021): 524–40.
Langgeng. S. “Peran Advokat Sebagai Penegak Hukum Dalam Mendukung Terwujudnya Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 01, no. 1 (2018): 138–56.
Lubis, Adelita. “Peran Advokat Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Organisasi Asosiasi Advokat Indonesia Cabang Medan.” JPPUMA: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Sosial Politik UMA (Journal of Governance and Political Social UMA) 2, no. 2 (2016): 176–92. http://ojs.uma.ac.id/index.php/jppuma.
Lubis, F. “Efektifitas Pengaturan Dan Tanggungjawab Profesi Advokat Dalam Mencegah Dan Memberantas Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Medan, Jakarta Dan Yogyakarta).,” 2019.
Munawar Sadzali, Alpi Sahari. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Advokat Akibat Surat Palsu Yang Digunakan Ketika Membela Kepentingan Hukum Klien (ANALISIS PUTUSAN NOMOR:618/PID.B/2019/PN.MDN).” Journal Dokrin Review 2, no. 1 (2023): 123–34. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/edaj.
Nasadi, Irmawati, and Suhartin I Akdaji. “The Dynamics of Marriage in the Modern Era : Between Tradition and State Law.” Indonesian Civil Law Review (ICLR) 1, no. 1 (2025): 69–83.
Pasal 1795 KUHPerdata Indonesia (n.d.).
Putri, Riska Fauziah Syafrina; Divia Zunfriska Irawan; Widya Rizky Ramadhani, and Setiawan; Dinda Putri Khairani; Mohammad Alvi Pratama. “Dilema Publisitas Advokat: Kajian Atas Larangan Promosi Di Media Sosial Berdasarkan Kode Etik Advokat Indonesia.” Das Sollen: Jurnal Kajian Kontemporer Hukum Dan Masyarakat 3, no. 1 (2025): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.11111/nusantara.xxxxxxx.
Raharjo, Budi, Rengga Kusuma Putra, and Methodius Kossay. “Legal Issues in the Supervision and Enforcement of Professional Ethics for Advocates in Indonesia.” Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Sosial 3, no. 1 (2025): 900–917. https://doi.org/10.51903/hakim.v3i1.2287.
Rosidi, Ahmad, M Zainuddin, and Ismi Arifiana. “Metode Dalam Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Sosiologis (Field Research).” Journal Law and Government 2, no. 1 (2024): 46–58.
Rozi, Mumuh M. “Peranan Advokat Sebagai Penegak Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dikaji Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 Tentang Advokat.” Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia 2, no. 1 (2017): 628–47. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/infografik/4-tahap-jadi-advokat-lt65952247352a0/.
Saepudin, Acep. “Kajian Terhadap Kedudukan Advokat Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia.” Milthree Law Journal 1, no. 1 (2024): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.70565/mlj.v1i1.1.
Sahar, Saharuddin, Andi Suryaman M. Pide, Yunus Wahid, Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra, and Amilang. “Transfer of Land Rights in the Tayade System.” Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah 10, no. 1 (2025): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v10i1.412.
Saharuddin, Andi Suryaman M. Pide, Yunus Wahid, Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra. “Legal Construction of Land Rights Transfer Under the Indigenous System (Tayade) in Gorontalo in Relation To The Principle Of Horizontal Separation.” Russian Law Journal XI, no. 5 (2023): 3033–39.
Saharuddin, Andi Suriyaman M. Pide, Yunus Wahid, Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra, Dzikra Ridha Dwi Aribah, and Rahmi Sahabuddin. “Tayade System Land Rights: The Concept of Unification of Customary Law and Indonesian Positive Law.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1430, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1430/1/012005.
Saraya, Sitta. “Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Terhadap Malpraktek Advokat Di Indonesia.” Intelektiva 1, no. 10 (2020): 160–69.
Setiawan, Arif, Lucky Suryo Wicaksono, Siti Anisah, and Eko Rial Nugroho. “Perbandingan Pengaturan Penyelenggaran Pendidikan Profesi Advokat (Ppa) Di Indonesia Dan Amerika Serikat.” Arena Hukum 2, no. 2 (2017): 120–40. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2017.01001.
Siregar, Maralutan, Tan Kamello, Hasim Purba, and Rosnidar Sembiring. “Pemisahan Gugatan Wanprestasi Dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Perspektif Hukum Materiil Dan Penerapan Di Pengadilan.” Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review 2, no. 6 (2023): 532–48. https://jurnal.locusmedia.id/index.php/jalr/article/view/187.
Suhartanto, Feri Pramudya, and Yenny Febrianty. “Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Civil Law Dan Common Law.” KONSENSUS: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum, Dan Ilmu Komunikasi 1, no. 3 (2024): 72–83.
Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2003 tentang Advokat, Pub. L. No. 18 (n.d.).