Law Enforcement Against Gambling Crime in Gorontalo City Police Area
Main Article Content
Abstract
The crime of gambling is a continuously evolving offense that negatively impacts the social and economic life of society. In the jurisdiction of the Gorontalo City Police (Polres Gorontalo Kota), gambling practices remain prevalent despite various law enforcement efforts. This study aims to analyze the law enforcement model against gambling crimes and identify the factors that hinder the effectiveness of law enforcement in the region. This research employs an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach. Data were obtained through literature studies and interviews with law enforcement officers and local communities. The analysis was conducted descriptively to illustrate the patterns of law enforcement and the challenges faced. The findings indicate that law enforcement against gambling crimes in the Gorontalo City Police jurisdiction is carried out through three main approaches: repressive, preventive, and legal counseling. Repressive actions involve direct enforcement against offenders, while preventive measures are implemented through routine patrols and monitoring of gambling activities. Additionally, legal counseling is provided to raise public awareness of the negative impacts of gambling. However, the effectiveness of law enforcement still faces several obstacles, such as weak regulations, limited resources and integrity of law enforcement officers, and a society that remains permissive toward gambling. The study concludes that a collaborative approach between the police, government agencies, non-governmental organizations, and the community is crucial in eradicating gambling crimes. Furthermore, strengthening the integrity and capacity of law enforcement officers is necessary to enhance their performance. As a recommendation, stricter regulations and continuous educational programs are needed to reduce gambling practices in society.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
ICLR License Terms
All articles published in the Indonesian Civil Law Review (ICLR) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) license. Under this license:
-
You are free to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
-
You are free to adapt, remix, and build upon the material for any non-commercial purpose.
-
You must give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and source, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
-
If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
-
You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
How to Cite
References
Andri Nirwana, A. N., Sulkhan Fajar Affani, Didi Junaedi, Sayed Akhyar, Sufian Suri, Ahmad Nurrohim, Yeti Dahliana, and Alfiyatul Azizah. “A Historical Review on Mapping the Evolution and Direction of Leadership in Islam: Challenges and Development Opportunities.” Multidisciplinary Reviews 7, no. 6 (2024). https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024124.
Anisa Rizki Fadhila, Anisa Rizki Fadhila. “TEORI HUKUM PROGRESIF (Prof. Dr. Satjipto Rahardjo, S.H.).” SINDA: Comprehensive Journal of Islamic Social Studies 1, no. 1 (2021): 122–32. https://doi.org/10.28926/sinda.v1i1.966.
Armet, Muh., and Ashabul Kahfi. “Korelasi Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Dengan Peningkatan Kejahatan Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19.” Alauddin Law Development Journal 5, no. 3 (2023): 632–43. https://doi.org/10.24252/aldev.v5i3.22312.
Azhari, Doni, Ade Daharis, Ade Ari Gumilar, Rusdaya Basri, Farid Naya, M Ihsan Darwis, and Sirajul Munir. Doni Azhari, Ade Daharis, Muhammad Abduh, Ade Ari Gumilar, Rusdaya Basri, Farid Naya, M.Ihsan Darwis, Sirajul Munir, Evi Safitri Gani, Zainal Said, n.d.
David tan. “Metode Penelitian Hukum: Mengupas Dan Mengulas Metodologi Dalam Menyelenggarakan Penelitian Hukum.” NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 8, no. 5 (2021): 1332–36. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/490668614.pdf.
Irwansyah. “Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel,” hlm 172. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2022.
Sagala, Fariz Eben Ezel, and Siti Mahmudah. “Perjudian Dalam Sudut Pandang Hukum Perdata.” AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 5, no. 2 (2023): 2363–70. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3889.
Saharuddin, Andi Suriyaman M Pide, Yunus Wahid, Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra, Dzikra Ridha Dwi Aribah, and Rahmi Sahabuddin. “Tayade System Land Rights: The Concept of Unification of Customary Law and Indonesian Positive Law.” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1430, no. 1 (December 1, 2024): 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1430/1/012005.
Saharuddin, Saharuddin, Mawardi De La Cruzz, Haritsah Haritsah, Rahmawati Rahmawati, and Rommi Y Hiola. “The Assimilation and Integration Rights for Prisoners as Over Capacity Prevention Effort in the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 5, no. 3 (2022): 227. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v5i3.23032.
Soerjono Soekanto. “Efektivitas Hukum Dan Penerapan Sanksi.,” hlm 305. Bandung.: CV. Ramadja Karya., 1988.
Turnip, Johannes Mangapul, Juliana Priska Dewi Sagala, Hellen Br Sembiring, and Sukses Marhasak Panungkunan Siburian. “Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Yang Di Lakukan Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur.” Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) 7, no. 1 (2024): 118–24. https://doi.org/10.34012/jihp.v7i1.5374.
Yunarti, Sri. “Dinamika Hukum Terkini” 6, no. 3 (2022): 1–17.