Agrarian Law Reform in Indonesia: Between Legal Certainty and Social Justice

Main Article Content

Eril Boli
Muh Nur Hidayat

Abstract

Agrarian law reform in Indonesia is an important effort to regulate the control and use of land in line with the principles of legal certainty and social justice. The phenomenon of inequality in land distribution, overlapping land rights, and the spread of agrarian conflicts are the main challenges in realizing equitable agrarian reform. This study aims to analyze the dynamics of agrarian law reform in Indonesia since the enactment of Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning the Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles (UUPA) through a normative juridical approach. Data is obtained from primary legal sources such as the UUPA, implementing regulations, court rulings, as well as relevant scientific literature and legal doctrine. The results of the study revealed that although the UUPA has become a comprehensive legal foundation, its implementation still faces various obstacles in ensuring legal certainty and social justice, especially related to agrarian conflicts and the protection of indigenous peoples' rights. A more responsive and inclusive legal approach is needed to address regulatory gaps and strengthen the protection of land rights for all levels of society. This study recommends policy reforms that integrate aspects of legal certainty and social justice through participatory dispute resolution mechanisms and formal recognition of indigenous peoples' rights in the national agrarian legal system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Agrarian Law Reform in Indonesia: Between Legal Certainty and Social Justice. (2025). Indonesian Civil Law Review, 1(1), 53-68. https://iclrmakanja.co.id/index.php/iclr/article/view/5

References

A. Dilapanga, Reynaldi. “Sertifikat Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Merupakan Alat Bukti Otentik Menurut Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria No. 5 Tahun 1960.” Lex Crimen VI, no. 5 (2017): 1. http://www.nber.org/papers/w16019.

Ali, Z. “Metode Penelitian Hukum.,” 105. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika., 2021.

Anggatiastara Cipta, Rifky. “Akta Pengikatan Jual Beli Tanah Sebelum Dibuatnya Akta Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.” Notarius 13, no. 2 (2020): 891. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v13i2.31291.

Arisaputra. “Reforma Agraria Di Indonesia.” edited by Maya Sari, 1st ed., 2. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika Bumi Aksara, 2021.

Bakri, M. “Unifikasi Dalam Pluralisme Hukum Tanah Di Indonesia (Rekonstruksi Konsep Unifikasi Dalam UUPA).” Jurnal Kertha Patrika 33, no. 1 (2008): hlm 2. https://doi.org/10.24843/kp.2008.v33.i01.p07.

Dkk, Yuda Sanrico Simanullang. “DINAMIKA PERUBAHAN SOSIAL DALAM MASYARAKAT AGRARIS THE DYNAMICS OF SOCIAL CHANGE IN AGRARIAN SOCIETIES.” JIIC: JURNAL INTELEK INSAN CENDIKIA 1, no. 8 (2024): 4108–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780333982921.

Hardiyanto, Barid. “Politics of Land Policies in Indonesia in the Era of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.” Land Use Policy 101, no. March (2021): 105134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105134.

Irwansyah. “Penelitian Hukum Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel,” hlm 172. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 2022.

Larasati, Ayu, and Raffles Raffles. “Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Dengan Perjanjian Jual Beli Menurut Hukum Pertanahan.” Zaaken Journal of Civil and Bussiness Law 1, no. 1 (2020): 127–44. http://online-journal.unja.ac.id/zaaken.

Mahadewi, Kadek Julia. “Tinjauan Yuridis Karakteristik Penggunaan Hak Pakai Dalam Kepemilikan Apartemen Oleh Warga Negara Asing Di Indonesia.” Gema Keadilan 6, no. 2 (2019): hlm 185. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2019.5862.

Muthallib, Abdul. “Pengaruh Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Mencapai Kepastian Hukum.” Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan, Dan Ekonomi Islam 12, no. 1 (2020): 26. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v12i1.1673.

Prasetyo, Galih, Eka Putri Kurmiati, Melati Lintang Kirana, and Rani Pajrin. “Sejarah Terbentuknya UU Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Ketentuan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria (Uupa) Dan Implementasinya Ditinjau Dari Awal Lahirnya Hukum Agraria Di Indonesia.” Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan 4, no. 5 (2024): 117. https://doi.org/DOI:https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v4i5.3657.

Qamar, Nurul, Aan Aswari, Hardianto Djanggih, Muhammad Syarif, Dachran S. Busthami, M. Kamal Hidjaz, and Rezah Farah Syah. Metode Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research Methods). Edited by Abd. Kahar Muzakkir. 1st ed. Makassar: CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn), 2017.

Rahmah, Siti, Husni Jalil, and M. Yakub Aiyub Kadir. “Legal Dilemma for Land Deed Officials in Transferring Land Title Within Agrarian Reform in Indonesia: A Study in Aceh, Indonesia.” Samarah 8, no. 1 (2024): 556–78. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v8i1.16898.

Sahar, Saharuddin, Andi Suryaman M. Pide, Yunus Wahid, Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra, and Amilang. “Transfer of Land Rights in the Tayade System.” Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah 10, no. 1 (2025): 195–210. https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v10i1.412.

Saharuddin, Andi Suriyaman M Pide, Yunus Wahid, Muhammad Ilham, and Rahmi Sahabuddin Arisaputra, Dzikra Ridha Dwi Aribah. “Tayade System Land Rights : The Concept of Unification of Customary Law and Indonesian Tayade System Land Rights : The Concept of Unification of Customary Law and Indonesian Positive Law.” In The First Forest and Society International Conference 2024 (The 1st FSIC 2024), 3. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1430 (2024) 012005, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1430/1/012005.

Widyaningsih, Kartika, Budi Santoso, Program Studi, Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, and Universitas Diponegoro. “Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Untuk Pertama Kali Terhadap Tanah Yang Belum Bersertipikat Melalui Program Nasional Agraria (Prona) Di Kantor Pertanahan Jakarta Barat.” Notarius 12, no. 2 (2019): 824–41.

Wirdaniati, Wida, Irman Firmansyah, Vidya Mar’atusholikha, and Siti Nurhajanah. “Model Of Legalization Of Land Certification in Rural Areas and Projection of The Value of Ownership Benefits.” Jurnal Hukum Unissula 38, no. 2 (2022): 122–37. https://doi.org/10.26532/jh.v38i2.18480.